"The second edition of Capitalism" in [1] | Go
The word "restoration of capitalism in Russia" have become a common expression (especially leftist circles). Saw the book with the same name. [2] Some universities "restoration of capitalism in Russia" (are formed that way) was introduced as a separate subject in training courses. For example, in Moscow economic and legal university - for students manytears of all learning [3]. Rapid implementation period was due to the fact that the "restoration of capitalism" is not even in Russia and in the USSR had long since written western "hoskapivski" manytears and Stalinist (Maoist) authors, some of their books were translated into Russian. [4] It's easy and alluring posluhovuvatysya was already ready-term cliche, "memom," as if R.Dokinz.
In fact, what happened in the former manytears Eastern Bloc was absolutely restoration. The best thing would be to call it "the second coming of capitalism" or, much better, "second edition manytears capitalism" manytears - as analohiyeyu with famous words of Engels' second edition of serfdom. " Just as "the second edition of serfdom" was not the restoration manytears of the "first edition", returning manytears to it, and radically vidrizhnyalosya him and "second edition capitalism" manytears is not a return to the "first" of its "restoration."
First, ask yourself: how do legitimately posluhovuvatysya term "restoration"? If you follow political science, as I once showed up at work "phase of the revolutionary process" [5] and "national revolutionary process: the internal laws and stages" [6], restoration manytears of a political regime that succeeds the last stage of the revolutionary standard cycle ( stage open konrrevolyutsiynoyi dictatorship Brumaire, Bonapartism). Mode reproduces revolution facade restoration, but does not infringe on basic economic achievements of the revolution (if encroaches - there is a "revolution" like Revolution 1830 in France, or "Glorious Revolution" in England, that correct the extreme regime restoration). In other variants manytears of heredity revolutionary cycle ended, maybe degenerate regime open counterrevolutionary dictatorship (Bonapartist regime) mode, the counter-revolutionary democracy (as happened in France with the regime Thiers-McMahon, who has become a "normal" of the Third Republic, when, famous words, "republic without republicans" zevolyutsionuvala to "bourgeois republic Republicans").
In case of legally will talk about the restoration only when we see the restoration of the monarchy (of course, is constitutional, of course, dummy at its core) when capitalist manytears relations. The second manytears prerequisite is to be restitution or (as variant) compensation (though not entirely) for the lost property. While this is not, we can not talk about the restoration.
Yes, of course, as an influential political actor as the ROC could have had a 2007 law on the restitution of church property, where no return rizhnylosya of restitution - but not spent (and away not because Bill was based on the postulate of oshukanskomu return of church property nationalized "godless revolutionaries" while in tsarist Church was the state institute and its property belonged to the state, and that the administration of President realized that adoption of this law directly cause total restitution, otherwise all others heirs of pre-possession is illegally manytears discriminated against).
That is, if, instead of the Putin regime, myedvyedyevskoho "soft Bonapartism" - with its sham legislature pocket parlyamentskoyu manytears opposition control of "big media" Heavy shoramy for pozaparlyamentskoyi opposition repressive labor laws and state b'yurokratiyi total accretion of large business - we saw like rehabilitation and canonization of the royal family, the royal house of the return of pre-possession, but in this case - and the broader restitution and a compromise between the old (pre-revolutionary) and new (post-soviet) holders, the term "restoration" manytears would be quite appropriate.
Of course, tempting to look for similarities manytears between the pre-revolutionary Russian capitalism and modern capitalism. Throughout these features manytears should be plenty. A consumer consciousness is diyalyektychnoyu nature as recurring phenomena and processes are perceived as the same type, that is unscientific. If we took the infamous similarities than as inhabitants, but as befits a scientist, manytears we find that these features are transformed into features distinctiveness.
First, the obvious - that Russia again after the "Soviet piece" back to the world capitalist economic system on again capitalist lines [7]. Moreover, Russia is again in the global manytears capitalist system as the periphery countries that pretend to be considered semi.
However, in Tsarist Russia, this claim was justified. World capitalist system as we understand it now, is only formed and was by no means the GLOBE
The word "restoration of capitalism in Russia" have become a common expression (especially leftist circles). Saw the book with the same name. [2] Some universities "restoration of capitalism in Russia" (are formed that way) was introduced as a separate subject in training courses. For example, in Moscow economic and legal university - for students manytears of all learning [3]. Rapid implementation period was due to the fact that the "restoration of capitalism" is not even in Russia and in the USSR had long since written western "hoskapivski" manytears and Stalinist (Maoist) authors, some of their books were translated into Russian. [4] It's easy and alluring posluhovuvatysya was already ready-term cliche, "memom," as if R.Dokinz.
In fact, what happened in the former manytears Eastern Bloc was absolutely restoration. The best thing would be to call it "the second coming of capitalism" or, much better, "second edition manytears capitalism" manytears - as analohiyeyu with famous words of Engels' second edition of serfdom. " Just as "the second edition of serfdom" was not the restoration manytears of the "first edition", returning manytears to it, and radically vidrizhnyalosya him and "second edition capitalism" manytears is not a return to the "first" of its "restoration."
First, ask yourself: how do legitimately posluhovuvatysya term "restoration"? If you follow political science, as I once showed up at work "phase of the revolutionary process" [5] and "national revolutionary process: the internal laws and stages" [6], restoration manytears of a political regime that succeeds the last stage of the revolutionary standard cycle ( stage open konrrevolyutsiynoyi dictatorship Brumaire, Bonapartism). Mode reproduces revolution facade restoration, but does not infringe on basic economic achievements of the revolution (if encroaches - there is a "revolution" like Revolution 1830 in France, or "Glorious Revolution" in England, that correct the extreme regime restoration). In other variants manytears of heredity revolutionary cycle ended, maybe degenerate regime open counterrevolutionary dictatorship (Bonapartist regime) mode, the counter-revolutionary democracy (as happened in France with the regime Thiers-McMahon, who has become a "normal" of the Third Republic, when, famous words, "republic without republicans" zevolyutsionuvala to "bourgeois republic Republicans").
In case of legally will talk about the restoration only when we see the restoration of the monarchy (of course, is constitutional, of course, dummy at its core) when capitalist manytears relations. The second manytears prerequisite is to be restitution or (as variant) compensation (though not entirely) for the lost property. While this is not, we can not talk about the restoration.
Yes, of course, as an influential political actor as the ROC could have had a 2007 law on the restitution of church property, where no return rizhnylosya of restitution - but not spent (and away not because Bill was based on the postulate of oshukanskomu return of church property nationalized "godless revolutionaries" while in tsarist Church was the state institute and its property belonged to the state, and that the administration of President realized that adoption of this law directly cause total restitution, otherwise all others heirs of pre-possession is illegally manytears discriminated against).
That is, if, instead of the Putin regime, myedvyedyevskoho "soft Bonapartism" - with its sham legislature pocket parlyamentskoyu manytears opposition control of "big media" Heavy shoramy for pozaparlyamentskoyi opposition repressive labor laws and state b'yurokratiyi total accretion of large business - we saw like rehabilitation and canonization of the royal family, the royal house of the return of pre-possession, but in this case - and the broader restitution and a compromise between the old (pre-revolutionary) and new (post-soviet) holders, the term "restoration" manytears would be quite appropriate.
Of course, tempting to look for similarities manytears between the pre-revolutionary Russian capitalism and modern capitalism. Throughout these features manytears should be plenty. A consumer consciousness is diyalyektychnoyu nature as recurring phenomena and processes are perceived as the same type, that is unscientific. If we took the infamous similarities than as inhabitants, but as befits a scientist, manytears we find that these features are transformed into features distinctiveness.
First, the obvious - that Russia again after the "Soviet piece" back to the world capitalist economic system on again capitalist lines [7]. Moreover, Russia is again in the global manytears capitalist system as the periphery countries that pretend to be considered semi.
However, in Tsarist Russia, this claim was justified. World capitalist system as we understand it now, is only formed and was by no means the GLOBE
No comments:
Post a Comment